How many bears are there in Greater Yellowstone and are numbers increasing?
According to the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team, there are 670-750 grizzly bears, but the population has not grown since 2002, and in fact has probably been declining since 2007. http://www.grizzlytimes.org/#!blank/c1sjy
Is the Federal government’s science on grizzly bear numbers reliable and accurate?
No. Independent scientists have demonstrated that the science used by the government to estimate bear numbers and make claims about recovery is unreliable and biased. http://www.grizzlytimes.org/#!the-numbers-game/bzlt2
What are the biggest causes of grizzly bear mortality?
The leading causes of mortality are conflicts with elk hunters and livestock operators, most of which are avoidable.
Grizzly bears are still being routinely killed as a result of becoming hooked on garbage and human foods, but sanitation has much improved.
Is grizzly bear mortality increasing?
Yes. Grizzly bear mortality has been increasing over the last decade, while population size has not. In 2015, a record-high and unsustainable number of grizzly bear deaths were reported. http://www.grizzlytimes.org/#!blank-3/icjii
Is the Yellowstone grizzly bear population scientifically recovered?
No. The grizzly bear population in Yellowstone is too small and isolated to be considered recovered.
But, there is still enough habitat to restore a connected population or 2,500 or more grizzly bears in the Northern Rockies.
How healthy is the Yellowstone Ecosystem for grizzly bears, and are conditions changing?
The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem is unraveling as a result of climate change and invasive species. In the last ten years, two key foods, whitebark pine and cutthroat trout, have been effectively lost to grizzly bears.
Government agencies are denying the problem, claiming that all substitute bear foods are equal when in fact they are not.
Are the states of Montana, Idaho and Wyoming prepared to manage grizzly bears if federal protections are removed?
No, the states have demonstrated hostility to large carnivores, including grizzly bears and the problem will worsen after federal oversight is removed after delisting. http://www.grizzlytimes.org/#!blank-9/c20pu
The post-delisting plans and Conservation Strategy are voluntary handshake agreements, rather than legally binding plans.
The states lack the resources to do it right, and post delisting plans have no committed funding. The annual $5-million post-delisting funding needed to support management and monitoring is voluntary.
What does the public think of the delisting proposal?
In seven previous public comment processes related to delisting and state plans, the public vigorously opposed delisting and hunting grizzly bears, and supported stronger protections. http://www.grizzlytimes.org/#!the-public-backs-bears/c1ux
You can find excerpts of public comments on the 2007 delisting rule here: